#geodesic (2018-10)

geodesic https://github.com/cloudposse/geodesic

Discussions related to https://github.com/cloudposse/geodesic Archive: https://archive.sweetops.com/geodesic/

2018-10-24

2018-10-23

tolstikov avatar
tolstikov

https://github.com/cloudposse/geodesic/pull/302/files

does it mean that you guys are not OK with the tools installation from the “PACKAGES-image” approach anymore? (I kinda liked it, BTW)

Use apks for all packages by osterman · Pull Request #302 · cloudposse/geodesic

what Use alpine packages everywhere possible why Better version management

Erik Osterman (Cloud Posse) avatar
Erik Osterman (Cloud Posse)

No we have no plans to deprecate the old method

Erik Osterman (Cloud Posse) avatar
Erik Osterman (Cloud Posse)

It should still work

Erik Osterman (Cloud Posse) avatar
Erik Osterman (Cloud Posse)

We will be updating it slightly, but interface won’t change

:--1:1
Erik Osterman (Cloud Posse) avatar
Erik Osterman (Cloud Posse)

is anyone using ansible in geodesic? I am inclined to remove it.

Erik Osterman (Cloud Posse) avatar
Erik Osterman (Cloud Posse)

We don’t promote it in any of our projects and it can always be installed with pip.

sarkis avatar
sarkis

I’m starting to lean on pip a lot - definitely agree that is the way to go here for python packages…

sarkis avatar
sarkis

also on a similar note … ansible, puppet, chef …. s

    keyboard_arrow_up