#helm (2022-06)

Archive: https://archive.sweetops.com/helm/

2022-06-01

bradym avatar

Bitnami chart repo appear to be broken:

$ curl -Ss <https://charts.bitnami.com/bitnami> | xmllint --format /dev/stdin
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<Error>
  <Code>AccessDenied</Code>
  <Message>Access Denied</Message>
  <RequestId>3JJ1S8D309MNZNFT</RequestId>
  <HostId>JD7bxIL1yZW9N+OX4yl5JWgcL6e1TR9TMGWY2YEVYUYor2mwM8EJw9XXTS1GH8hwAY2L/Begmhc=</HostId>
</Error>
Andrew Nazarov avatar
Andrew Nazarov

This happens from time to time wit bitnami repos. We do automatic retries to mitigate this problem

Andrew Nazarov avatar
Andrew Nazarov

And they are trying to mitigate this https://github.com/bitnami/charts/issues/10539

However this solution broke our dependencies.

As reported in this issue (#8433), in the last few times we are facing some issues with the index.yaml associated with the Bitnami Helm charts repository.

Current situation

After some investigation, it seems the root cause is related to CloudFront reaching some limits due to the volume of traffic when serving the index.yaml.
This index.yaml contains all the Bitnami Helm charts history (around 15300 entries), producing a pretty fat 14MB file. Given the size of the file and the volume of traffic, thousands of terabytes of download traffic per month are being generated.

One of the alternatives considered was the use of compression at CloudFront, in that case, this solution doesn’t work since compression is not used by the Helm client (helm) itself (see helm/helm#8070) so it doesn’t solve the reported issue.

Mitigation

As the first line of action, we will reduce the size of the index.yaml by removing some old versions and keeping all versions for a period of time (6 months).

:warning: Please note this action is not removing/deleting any Helm chart, packaged tarballs (.tgz) won’t be removed, this action is only affecting index.yaml used to list the Helm charts. Previous versions of the index.yaml can be used to install old Helm charts.

Please note Helm charts tarballs (.tgz) won’t be removed, this action is only affecting index.yaml.

Result

Applying this approach (#10530), we obtained the following results:

Total chart versions
* Before: 15260
* Removed: 12138
* After: 3122

Producing a reduced 3.5MB index.yaml.

:wrench: Workaround for previous versions

The index.yaml is stored in this repository under the index branch, users should be able to use any commit in that branch to add a previous version of the index.yaml.

• Manually using helm repo add

$ helm repo add bitnami-pre-2022 <https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bitnami/charts/eb5f9a9513d987b519f0ecd732e7031241c50328/bitnami>
"bitnami-pre-2022" has been added to your repositories

• When used as a dependency in Chart.yaml:

  - name: postgresql
    version: 8.1.0
-   repository: <https://charts.bitnami.com/bitnami>
+   repository: <https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bitnami/charts/eb5f9a9513d987b519f0ecd732e7031241c50328/bitnami>
    condition: postgresql.enabled
bradym avatar

Yeah, broke a dependency for us too.

bradym avatar

And they’re working on it, just found this github issue: https://github.com/bitnami/charts/issues/8433

Which chart: Not chart but bitnami helm repo - helm repo add bitnami <https://charts.bitnami.com/bitnami>
The name (and version) of the affected chart

Describe the bug
As part of CI tests, we add bitnami repo and do some chart-testing. This breaks CI flow . is there any option to retry or is it a known issue

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
helm repo add bitnami <https://charts.bitnami.com/bitnami>
Error: looks like “https://charts.bitnami.com/bitnami” is not a valid chart repository or cannot be reached: stream error: stream ID 1; INTERNAL_ERROR

Expected behavior
A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.

Version of Helm and Kubernetes: 3.5.4

• Output of helm version:

(paste your output here)

• Output of kubectl version:

(paste your output here)

Additional context
This doesn’t happen always but fails 2 out of 10 times atleast

bradym avatar

Seems to be an intermittent issue, a retry seems to be the current workaround.

2022-06-08

2022-06-19

Jeremy (UnderGrid Network Services) avatar
Jeremy (UnderGrid Network Services)

Working on drafting a Helm chart from scratch, my first ever, and could use a sounding board for suggestions and ideas on situation I’m seeing. I currently have an initContainer that launches and executes DB migration/init steps which is fine if replicas: 1 is set but if I increase it as I would expect in a non-dev mode the initContainer pod going into a locked state as the DB isn’t exclusive so I really need to find a way to execute the migration/init stageas a pod without using it as an initContainer and have the main container for the deployment hold until the migration/init pod has completed and terminated. I think this is also why my helm upgrade hangs as it launches the new deployment which hangs on the init process.

steenhoven avatar
steenhoven

Maybe a single job that is started and have something for the main pods to hold their horses?

Jeremy (UnderGrid Network Services) avatar
Jeremy (UnderGrid Network Services)

Yeah that’s what I’m trying now. I have the database migration/init cut out from being an initContainer as a Job. I haven’t found a way to get the main pod Deployment to wait to start before running itself or to stop during an upgrade to allow the migration/init Job to execute

2022-06-20

2022-06-23

steenhoven avatar
steenhoven

Does anyone know of an alternative thats like Infracost for Helm charts?

RB (Ronak) (Cloud Posse) avatar
RB (Ronak) (Cloud Posse)

kubecost maybe

RB (Ronak) (Cloud Posse) avatar
RB (Ronak) (Cloud Posse)
kubecost/cost-analyzer-helm-chart

Kubecost helm chart

RB (Ronak) (Cloud Posse) avatar
RB (Ronak) (Cloud Posse)

I’ve never used it or heard about it until today

RB (Ronak) (Cloud Posse) avatar
RB (Ronak) (Cloud Posse)
Kubernetes Cost Monitoring With Kubecostattachment image

A hands-on look at using Kubecost to observe the costs of your Kubernetes clusters

steenhoven avatar
steenhoven

Thanks. That way you’ll have to create the diff yourself and afterwards.

The beauty of Infracost, is that you can see the cost diff upfront.

    keyboard_arrow_up