#pr-reviews (2020-12)
Pull Request Reviews for Cloud Posse Projects
2020-12-02
2020-12-03
hey team @Brandon Wilson I am going through a bunch of your modules that I use but I am on TF 0.14….
https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-iam-system-user/pull/38 https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-dynamodb-autoscaler/pull/27 https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-route53-cluster-hostname/pull/29
once these are in, i’ll do the next round
make this module v14 compatible
make this module v14 compatible
make this module v14 compatible
ok, I’ve kicked off /test all
everywhere
make this module v14 compatible
make this module v14 compatible
make this module v14 compatible
bump me if they pass and we can merge
all failing on readme..
Thanks @Jurgen
(btw, you can run make init && make readme
to build it locally)
kk, will do in the next round.. all of these modules are dependencies in other modules so once these are good and have new verions i’ll update the parents
seems like the readme hates us
bummer
$ make init && make readme
Cloning <https://github.com/cloudposse/build-harness.git#master>...
Cloning into 'build-harness'...
remote: Enumerating objects: 129, done.
remote: Counting objects: 100% (129/129), done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (104/104), done.
remote: Total 129 (delta 5), reused 67 (delta 5), pack-reused 0
Receiving objects: 100% (129/129), 74.84 KiB | 210.00 KiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (5/5), done.
Installing packages 0.133.0...
Cloning into '/Users/jurgen.weber/checkouts/deltatre/terraform-aws-route53-cluster-hostname/build-harness/vendor/packages'...
error: RPC failed; curl 18 transfer closed with outstanding read data remaining
fatal: error reading section header 'shallow-info'
make[1]: *** /Users/jurgen.weber/checkouts/deltatre/terraform-aws-route53-cluster-hostname/build-harness/vendor/packages/install: No such file or directory. Stop.
make: *** [/Users/jurgen.weber/checkouts/deltatre/terraform-aws-route53-cluster-hostname/build-harness/modules/packages/Makefile:24: packages/install/gomplate] Error 2
I think that’s a connectivity issue. Did you try a couple of times?
yeah
I haven’t seen it but I read it can be due to a slow connection somewhere
You could try git fetch (https://stackoverflow.com/a/44151771/366965) in build-harness
I’m facing this error when I try to clone a repository from GitLab (GitLab 6.6.2 4ef8369): remote: Counting objects: 66352, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (10417/10417), done. error: RPC f…
I think an older version of git
or anything I need to do to resolve?
Do you still get that error?
Is your git cli up to date?
well, this is in your CI, yeah?
and yeah, its up to date.
oh I thought the error was on your local machine
$ git --version
git version 2.29.2
i thought that was weird
yeah, that error is from my machine but dunno
seems to work today
oh but actually we were talking about you running make init && make readme
right
all those PR’s are ticked now can we merge?
if tests are passing, then yes
i’ll take a look shortly
thanks for the heads up
cool, np
these ones are all dependencies of something else, so i’ll do the parents next
actually I left a note on one. the null-label module latest version is now 0.22.0 so I think it’d be good to reference that one
boom, sure
great!
all done
now its pushed
Thanks
3 done @Jurgen
https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-iam-s3-user/pull/26 https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-dynamodb/pull/71 https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-elasticsearch/pull/84 https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-elasticache-redis/pull/92 https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-efs/pull/62
next round there @Joe Hosteny @Erik Osterman (Cloud Posse)
all of tem seem to be dying here? https://github.com/cloudposse/actions/runs/1510466275?check_suite_focus=true
@Jurgen some changes to test-harness - I’m having a look. Do your branches allow maintainer edits?
yeah, go for it
Can you try:
make init
make terraform/rewrite-module-source
?
on which one?
any of those
sed: 1: "s,"git::<https://github>. ...": \1 not defined in the RE
make: *** [/Users/jurgen.weber/checkouts/deltatre/terraform-aws-elasticache-redis/build-harness/modules/terraform/Makefile:49: terraform/rewrite-module-source] Error 1
assumes gnu sed?
yeah same for me
on mac
yeah
I will try to get it working using the build-harness docker image
@Jeremy G (Cloud Posse)
@Joe Niland @Jurgen I am currently working on both test-harness
and build-harness
so you might want to take a break.
In general, tests are expected to be run in the [testing.cloudposse.co](http://testing.cloudposse.co)
Docker image and the update scripts are expected to be run in the build-harness
Docker image. We are using a new (to us) tool, terraform-config-inspect
that is not installed in Geodesic or in build-harness
at this time, though I am working on getting it into build-harness.
The bigger issue is that going forward, we are requiring that all providers and module sources use the registry format. Any changes to modules require that you also update those.
We are working on automating those changes so we can push them out everywhere, and quickly, but running into a few snags slowing us down.
Hey @Jeremy G (Cloud Posse) Thanks for the info.
I am trying to use the new make target to change the provider format so the tests will pass for Jurgen’s PRs.
I was trying to do this with the build-harness Dockerfile but just trying to figure out how to build it in the context of the Terraform module directory because it doesn’t seem to mount the module dir as a volume. There’s probably a way to do this I’m not aware of!
So far I did this (from the root directory of the terraform-aws-iam-s3-user
module:
make init
docker build . -t build-harness -f build-harness/Dockerfile
docker run build-harness terraform/rewrite-module-source
it outputs the following but doesn’t change anything:
context.tf
main.tf
examples/complete/context.tf
It should modify a line such as this right?
source = "git::<https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-iam-system-user.git?ref=tags/0.17.0>"
ah it’ll be modifying it within the container
if you can, please let me know how/if I can do the above!
Sorry, Joe, build-harness
is not ready for this task yet. Still working on it. Give us another day or so.
No worries, Jeremy. Appreciate all your work on this!
BTW, we might need a PSA on the #pr-reviews channel because there are quite a few PR’s waiting on the tests to pass.
last one I think; https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-s3-bucket/pull/65
make this module v14 compatible
2020-12-06
2020-12-07
2020-12-08
Hi! Could someone take a look?
https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-ecs-cloudwatch-autoscaling/pull/9 https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-ecs-web-app/pull/79
what Use context feature and latest null-label module why The module should have context feature due to it is used by another modules like ecs-web-app
what Customisable aws log prefix why May be helpful in case of you don’t use name in label module
Hey @Mikhail Naletov — we just made a change to our bats tests to enforce Terraform registry modules, so they may get hung up by this new requirement. We’re looking to have a make target to make this easy in the coming days.
what Use context feature and latest null-label module why The module should have context feature due to it is used by another modules like ecs-web-app
what Customisable aws log prefix why May be helpful in case of you don’t use name in label module
Nice improvement!
@here PSA: we’re working on some of the underlying scaffolding and tooling to better support 0.14 and future updates. 0.13 was a big pain, and we learned a lot. A few things are happening behind the scenes:
• We’re switching everything on our side over to the terraform registry notation so we can use rennovatebot
(which doesn’t like our ref=tags/...
format).
• In order to support the registry notation, we needed to update our test-harness
to support bats (this is done, but is not backwards compatible).
• We’re adding mergify
to quickly merge automated PRs, but were quickly blocked by the next hurdle: mergify
cannot be a CODEOWNER
because it’s a GitHub App. So we need to upgrade our account. Working on that (but it’s expensive!)
• We’ve added added the make targets to quickly convert a module to use the “new” (but not so new) provider and registry notation. But turns out many have trouble running this with the build-harness natively, so we’re going to add a make docker/shell
target to run it in a container and mount the cwd
into the container. This will also help with make readme
and other things like it.
• We’ve added the github actions to automatically rebuild the README nightly, but it’s blocked on the mergify issue above.
• We’ve added the github actions to automatically update the [context.tf](http://context.tf)
from the central copy in terraform-null-label
• We’ve added the make target to the build-harness which will update the lower-bound pinning for modules pinned to >= 0.12
to be >=0.12.26
(to support new provider syntax)
• We’ve drafted the rennovatebot configuration to automatically update module pinning and run tests, then merge when they pass. All of this work will make all future upgrades of terraform breezy. Unfortunately, with so many changes, we ran into the inevitable rough edges.
This is all to say, we’re currently blocked on testing PRs because tests are failing due to our changes. We’re working to fix those. ETA is by end-of-the-week.
i haven’t used mergify with CODEOWNERS… that’s interesting… i did find that if i enabled “restrict who can push to matching branches” in the branch protection rule, then i needed to add mergify there…
note, I don’t think mergify
is the account of the GitHub App “Mergify”
GitHub is where mergify builds software.
so with branch protections, you were able to add the mergify app?
@Jeremy G (Cloud Posse)
yes, mergify
is the bot account for the mergify app
in the search box for that branch protection feature, it will only let you select users or teams that have write privileges to the repo, or app integrations
you guys sound busy.
how is all of this going?
very close! @Jeremy G (Cloud Posse) just merged one more PR a few minutes ago related to the build-harness
. The test-harness
changes should merge any minute now.
I think we’re just about ready to start rolling it out wholesale (but defer to @Jeremy G (Cloud Posse))
Build harness and Test harness updates have been released, now verifying that all is good.
We will have a document describing how to update a Terraform module for Terraform 0.14 and our new standards soon.
Can someone please let me know if this PR is good enough? This is my first PR, so if something is missing please educate me. https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-rds/pull/79
what Added Microsoft SQL Server example why There was MySQL RDS example but nothing for MSSQL
I already commented on it earlier
what Added Microsoft SQL Server example why There was MySQL RDS example but nothing for MSSQL
Thank you!!! Roughly how much time it will take?
I had one more PR on my mind - example for postgresql Should I do it? or Wait for automated tests results?
Sorry, not sure exactly but possibly end of this week.
Can someone review the pr? Thanks
@Joe Niland
I can still see the message “Merge is blocked which needs at least one approval.” How I can merge into master?
I think I don’t have permission to merge into master. Is my understanding correct?
@Joe Niland I have done development on remote branch i.e. https://github.com/amitkarpe/terraform-aws-rds/tree/examples/mssql-complete/examples Based on my knowledge rebase to master for open source project is not good suggestion.
Can you let me know how should I do rebase?
Terraform module to provision AWS RDS instances. Contribute to amitkarpe/terraform-aws-rds development by creating an account on GitHub.
The golden rule of git rebase is to never use it on public branches.
So please let me know how to do it.
Compare git rebase with the related git merge command and identify all of the potential opportunities to incorporate rebasing into the typical Git workflow
I think all you need to do is merge master from the cloudposse repo into your feature branch.
I am sorry but I am not sure how to do it. Here my following commands from my repo directory
➜ gco examples/mssql-complete
Switched to branch 'examples/mssql-complete'
Your branch is behind 'origin/examples/mssql-complete' by 2 commits, and can be fast-forwarded.
(use "git pull" to update your local branch)
➜ git status
On branch examples/mssql-complete
Your branch is behind 'origin/examples/mssql-complete' by 2 commits, and can be fast-forwarded.
(use "git pull" to update your local branch)
nothing to commit, working tree clean
➜ git merge master
Already up to date.
➜ gco master
Switched to branch 'master'
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/master'.
➜ git merge master
Already up to date.
Any suggestion?
You need to do
git remote add upstream https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-rds.git
git fetch upstream
git merge upstream/master
done
➜ git remote add upstream <https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-rds.git>
➜ git remote -v
origin <https://github.com/amitkarpe/terraform-aws-rds> (fetch)
origin <https://github.com/amitkarpe/terraform-aws-rds> (push)
upstream <https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-rds.git> (fetch)
upstream <https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-rds.git> (push)
➜ git fetch upstream
remote: Enumerating objects: 31, done.
remote: Counting objects: 100% (31/31), done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (8/8), done.
remote: Total 34 (delta 23), reused 26 (delta 22), pack-reused 3
Unpacking objects: 100% (34/34), done.
From <https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-rds>
* [new branch] 0.11/master -> upstream/0.11/master
...
* [new tag] 0.28.0 -> 0.28.0
➜ git merge upstream/master
Updating a802859..c682edb
Fast-forward
...
...
create mode 100644 test/src/go.sum
➜ git push
Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0)
To <https://github.com/amitkarpe/terraform-aws-rds>
a802859..c682edb master -> master
After this should run :
git checkout examples/mssql-complete
git rebase master
git checkout master
git rebase master examples/mssql-complete
Will this will rebase to master?
No, the above commands should have been run from your feature branch
So you can check it out and merge master into it and then push to update the PR
➜ git checkout examples/mssql-complete
Already on 'examples/mssql-complete'
Your branch is behind 'origin/examples/mssql-complete' by 2 commits, and can be fast-forwarded.
(use "git pull" to update your local branch)
➜ git merge upstream/master
Removing test/src/Gopkg.toml
Removing test/src/Gopkg.lock
Merge made by the 'recursive' strategy.
...
...
➜ gst
On branch examples/mssql-complete
Your branch and 'origin/examples/mssql-complete' have diverged,
and have 7 and 1 different commits each, respectively.
(use "git pull" to merge the remote branch into yours)
nothing to commit, working tree clean
But push failed:
➜ gco master
Switched to branch 'master'
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/master'.
➜ git push origin examples/mssql-complete
To <https://github.com/amitkarpe/terraform-aws-rds>
! [rejected] examples/mssql-complete -> examples/mssql-complete (non-fast-forward)
error: failed to push some refs to '<https://github.com/amitkarpe/terraform-aws-rds>'
hint: Updates were rejected because a pushed branch tip is behind its remote
hint: counterpart. Check out this branch and integrate the remote changes
hint: (e.g. 'git pull ...') before pushing again.
hint: See the 'Note about fast-forwards' in 'git push --help' for details.
You need to git pull your feature branch
➜ git pull
Already up to date!
Merge made by the 'recursive' strategy.
➜ gst
On branch examples/mssql-complete
Your branch is ahead of 'origin/examples/mssql-complete' by 8 commits.
(use "git push" to publish your local commits)
nothing to commit, working tree clean
Pull was successful
➜ git log --oneline
4cbf0e3 (HEAD -> examples/mssql-complete) Merge branch 'examples/mssql-complete' of <https://github.com/amitkarpe/terraform-aws-rds> into examples/mssql-complete
564fe34 Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into examples/mssql-complete
c682edb (tag: 0.28.1, upstream/master, origin/master, origin/HEAD, master) chore(deps): update terraform cloudposse/label/null to v0.22.1 (#84)
...
...
Should I push like this git push origin examples/mssql-complete
?
done
➜ git push origin examples/mssql-complete
Enumerating objects: 10, done.
Counting objects: 100% (10/10), done.
Delta compression using up to 8 threads
Compressing objects: 100% (4/4), done.
Writing objects: 100% (4/4), 637 bytes | 318.00 KiB/s, done.
Total 4 (delta 1), reused 0 (delta 0)
remote: Resolving deltas: 100% (1/1), completed with 1 local object.
To <https://github.com/amitkarpe/terraform-aws-rds>
5e326ea..4cbf0e3 examples/mssql-complete -> examples/mssql-complete
I can see the latest commits at pull/79/commits Looks like “All checks have passed”
Yes the pre checks are ok but need to check terratest. I just noticed one thing. Could you please change the region in fixtures to us-east-2?
ok
➜ ga .
➜ gcam "changed the region in fixtures to us-east-2"
[examples/mssql-complete f1e140b] changed the region in fixtures to us-east-2
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 examples/mssql/fixtures.us-east-2.tfvars
➜ git push origin examples/mssql-complete
To <https://github.com/amitkarpe/terraform-aws-rds>
! [rejected] examples/mssql-complete -> examples/mssql-complete (fetch first)
error: failed to push some refs to '<https://github.com/amitkarpe/terraform-aws-rds>'
hint: Updates were rejected because the remote contains work that you do
hint: not have locally. This is usually caused by another repository pushing
hint: to the same ref. You may want to first integrate the remote changes
hint: (e.g., 'git pull ...') before pushing again.
hint: See the 'Note about fast-forwards' in 'git push --help' for details.
➜ gst
On branch examples/mssql-complete
Your branch is ahead of 'origin/examples/mssql-complete' by 2 commits.
(use "git push" to publish your local commits)
nothing to commit, working tree clean
Solved:
➜ git pull
remote: Enumerating objects: 2, done.
remote: Counting objects: 100% (2/2), done.
remote: Total 2 (delta 1), reused 2 (delta 1), pack-reused 0
Unpacking objects: 100% (2/2), done.
From <https://github.com/amitkarpe/terraform-aws-rds>
4cbf0e3..c95d1a9 examples/mssql-complete -> origin/examples/mssql-complete
Merge made by the 'recursive' strategy.
README.md | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
➜ git push origin examples/mssql-complete
Enumerating objects: 17, done.
Counting objects: 100% (15/15), done.
Delta compression using up to 8 threads
Compressing objects: 100% (11/11), done.
Writing objects: 100% (11/11), 1.53 KiB | 520.00 KiB/s, done.
Total 11 (delta 5), reused 0 (delta 0)
remote: Resolving deltas: 100% (5/5), completed with 2 local objects.
To <https://github.com/amitkarpe/terraform-aws-rds>
c95d1a9..88ee348 examples/mssql-complete -> examples/mssql-complete
It seems the test may need a fix or maybe something in the module. Also your new test doesn’t seem to be called.
Can I create new fork and try again?
You can just keep pushing to your feature branch
As of now I don’t have any plan to change any code. So there won’t be any new changes.
If you can please ensure your test will be included in the terratest run
I am sorry, but I have done any terratest for this module. How to do it? What is procedure to submit the test results?
@Joe Niland test/terratest — tests failed
I must say that @Joe Niland guided me with tremendous patience Thanks again!!!
2020-12-09
Hello I have a PR for you. This adds a delivery policy to an SNS topic (to override the default). I’m still new to making PRs here so please tell me if I’m doing something wrong https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-sns-topic/pull/23
what Add a retry policy for the SNS topic why Override the default retry policy for SNS as some of the default settings are not suitable for all subscriptions NOTE: The value defaults to null, …
please look at your fork permissions
what Add a retry policy for the SNS topic why Override the default retry policy for SNS as some of the default settings are not suitable for all subscriptions NOTE: The value defaults to null, …
it seems that is restricting the merge
I don’t recall needing to change any permissions the last time I forked and made a PR. Do you know what settings are needed?
2020-12-10
2020-12-11
hey hey, requesting a test run and quick review on https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-cloudfront-s3-cdn/pull/116
This adds an output to access the Cloudfront distribution's Origin Access identity, if it is enabled, else a blank string. We need this to provide access to the Cloudfront distribution from an …
Merged and released as 0.38.0 — Thanks @mihai.plesa!
This adds an output to access the Cloudfront distribution's Origin Access identity, if it is enabled, else a blank string. We need this to provide access to the Cloudfront distribution from an …
2020-12-13
2020-12-15
Hey guys, tiny PR for enabling terraform-aws-rds to work with terraform 14 https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-rds/pull/80
what Upgrading dependency modules to versions that supporting Terraform 14 why For using this module with Terraform 14
Hi, I am trying to mask sensitive information from plan
and apply
output. I tried couple of ways:
• using sensitive keyword, but https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-rds-cluster.git?ref=tags/0.35.0 version pinned at required_version = “>= 0.12.0, < 0.14.0” and sensitive keyword is available from >= 0.14.0
• Tfmask doesn’t seems to work with resources or values which are lists. (I am trying to mask helm values variable).
Any suggestions on how to go about this.
@Maxim Mironenko (Cloud Posse)
hey @Maxim Mironenko (Cloud Posse) should i close my PR?
@Guy Elia yes, I made a new one based on your PR, but because your branch was closed to writing I have to create new PR.
Hey y’all, can somebody take a look at this one: https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-ec2-bastion-server/pull/45
I was trying to fix it locally and submit a PR before I saw this one and it looks good to me!
what Conditionally configure default security group ingress only when length(var.ingress_security_groups) > 0 why Otherwise, it detects an update on every plan run even if applied (which who…
2020-12-16
@Jeremy G (Cloud Posse) May I ask you to fix validate-codeowners
for repos, please:
https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-rds/pull/81
https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-tls-ssh-key-pair/pull/21
https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-ecs-cloudwatch-autoscaling/pull/10
what Upgrade to support Terraform 0.14 and bring up to current Cloud Posse standard why Support Terraform 0.14
what Upgrade to support Terraform 0.14 and bring up to current Cloud Posse standard why Support Terraform 0.14
what Upgrade to support Terraform 0.14 and bring up to current Cloud Posse standard why Support Terraform 0.14
Done
what Upgrade to support Terraform 0.14 and bring up to current Cloud Posse standard why Support Terraform 0.14
what Upgrade to support Terraform 0.14 and bring up to current Cloud Posse standard why Support Terraform 0.14
what Upgrade to support Terraform 0.14 and bring up to current Cloud Posse standard why Support Terraform 0.14
Announcement: We have created some tools to help update our Terraform modules so that they work with Terraform 0.14. Please read the instructions at https://docs.cloudposse.com/community/updating-modules-for-terraform-14/ if you want to help by converting a module.
2020-12-17
Hey Cloudposse, someone can review @Maxim Mironenko (Cloud Posse) PR? https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-rds/pull/81
what Upgrade to support Terraform 0.14 and bring up to current Cloud Posse standard why Support Terraform 0.14
Thanks! @Joe Niland
what Upgrade to support Terraform 0.14 and bring up to current Cloud Posse standard why Support Terraform 0.14
Np
Pull request auto-merge public beta
Ah but it’s a manual step like “okay, yeah merge this once those checks pass” not a “merge this if checks pass and it has this label”.
Pull request auto-merge public beta
yeah, not so great. basically just the “merge when checks pass” that gitlab has had for a while
2020-12-19
@Jeremy G (Cloud Posse) Please, fix this repo with proper codeowners, when you have time:
<https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-vpc-peering/pull/28>
@Jeremy G (Cloud Posse) and this one, please:
<https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-cloudformation-stack/pull/8>
@Jeremy G (Cloud Posse) and this, please:
<https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-s3-website/pull/46>
First time submitting a PR to one of these repos. Would be grateful for any feedback to make this more in line with expectations. Hoping this is an easy merge. https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-s3-bucket/pull/66
what Adds a new option - "enable_current_object_expiration" for selectively disabling current object expiration. Default to true to maintain behavior with existing versions. why Users tha…
LGTM except for one typo. We need to run the tests on it but GitHub Actions is currently having some issues. Hopefully resolved soon.
what Adds a new option - "enable_current_object_expiration" for selectively disabling current object expiration. Default to true to maintain behavior with existing versions. why Users tha…
@Jeremy G (Cloud Posse) if still available, I think this one needs the Codeowners validation fix: https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-ec2-bastion-server/pull/49
'Forked' from #29 what Resurrect abandoned PR #29 created by @DeividasJackus Tweaked aws_security_group definition to: Only create ingress rules if allowed_cidr_blocks variable is specifie…
Fixed
'Forked' from #29 what Resurrect abandoned PR #29 created by @DeividasJackus Tweaked aws_security_group definition to: Only create ingress rules if allowed_cidr_blocks variable is specifie…
Thank you!
2020-12-21
@Jeremy G (Cloud Posse) Please, fix these repos with proper codeowners, when you have time:
<https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-documentdb-cluster/pull/20>
<https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-ec2-instance-group/pull/18>
<https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-ec2-autoscale-group/pull/39>
<https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-vpn-connection/pull/9>
hello there! can someone review this PR (https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-ecs-container-definition/pull/107) please? cheers
what The key resourceRequirements is added based on https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonECS/latest/APIReference/API_ContainerDefinition.html Very simple addition of one variable that is a list of Re…
@Makeshift (Connor Bell) @Joe Niland
Can do if nobody has gotten to it this evening (~8h from now). Just travelling back from holiday :)
sure! safe travel
2020-12-22
Hello, another PR here for you (Allow configuring SCRAM authentication for MSK): https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-aws-msk-apache-kafka-cluster/pull/6
what Allow cluster to be created with SCRAM authentication. why TLS authentication is not suitable in our use case, we need to use the SCRAM authentication mechanism.
@Maxim Mironenko (Cloud Posse)
what Allow cluster to be created with SCRAM authentication. why TLS authentication is not suitable in our use case, we need to use the SCRAM authentication mechanism.
The tests on this one appear to be broken due to an unsupported Kafka version? I haven’t changed anything to do with the versioning in this PR.